Journal of Aging and Health

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sparer, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sparer, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Aging and Health, Vol. 15, No. 1, 269-291 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0898264302239030

Managed Long-Term Care:

Limits and Lessons

Michael S. Sparer, PhD

The Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health Columbia University

In the mid-1990s, states began to reduce their reliance on commercial health plans in the primary and acute care markets. At the same time, however, many states are for the first time encouraging these plans to participate in long-term care programs. The evidence suggests, however, that commercial health plans will not provide a quick cure to the long-term care system. At the same time, several states have managed long-term care initiatives that do not rely on commercial health plans but that do an excellent job of case management and that also seem to be among the national leaders in offering home and community-based services. Oregon provides one example, but so does the traditional managed long-term care system in Arizona and the Community Options Program in Wisconsin. The current efforts in Arizona and Wisconsin to abandon these models and to embrace competition may therefore be a mistake.

Key Words: managed long-term care • Medicaid • home- and community-based services


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
M. S. Sparer
States and the Politics of Incrementalism: Health Policy in Wisconsin during the 1990s
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, April 1, 2004; 29(2): 269 - 292.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
M. S. Sparer
Leading the Health Policy Orchestra: The Need for an Intergovernmental Partnership
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, April 1, 2003; 28(2-3): 245 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Aging HealthHome page
P. H. Feldman
From Philosophy to Practice:: Selected Issues in Financing and Coordinating Long-Term Care
J Aging Health, February 1, 2003; 15(1): 5 - 14.
[PDF]