Journal of Aging and Health

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fultz, N. H.
Right arrow Articles by Herzog, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fultz, N. H.
Right arrow Articles by Herzog, A. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Aging and Health, Vol. 12, No. 4, 459-469 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/089826430001200401

Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence in Middle-Aged and Older Women

A Survey-Based Methodological Experiment

Nancy H. Fultz, PhD

Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan

A. Regula Herzog, PhD

Institute for Social Research, Institute of Gerontology and Department of Psychology, University of Michigan

Objective:To determine whether self-reports of urinary incontinence are influenced by the context in which survey questions are presented. Variation in the extent to which surveys promote complete and accurate reporting may help explain the wide range of published prevalence estimates. Methods:Respondents to a nationally representative telephone survey were randomly assigned one of two questionnaire forms. Both forms contained the same incontinence question. One form included an introduction and follow-up probe, which acknowledged the embarrassment of discussing incontinence and stressed the importance of thorough reporting. Results:Use of the introduction and probe produced a significantly higher prevalence rate, with the effect varying by respondent’s age. Discussion:The prevalence of incontinence is likely to be underestimated unless studies attend to the possibility of biased reporting. The finding of a form by age interaction suggests the importance of survey context in studies of risk factors, as well as in prevalence studies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
V. A. Minassian, W. F. Stewart, and G. C. Wood
Urinary Incontinence in Women: Variation in Prevalence Estimates and Risk Factors
Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2008; 111(2): 324 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
T. P. Miles, R. F. Palmer, D. V. Espino, C. P. Mouton, M. J. Lichtenstein, and K. S. Markides
New-Onset Incontinence and Markers of Frailty: Data From the Hispanic Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., January 1, 2001; 56(1): 19M - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text]